LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for JESSE Archives


JESSE Archives

JESSE Archives


JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JESSE Home

JESSE Home

JESSE  January 2012

JESSE January 2012

Subject:

Re: RateMyProfessor.com (fwd)

From:

Gretchen Whitney <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:37:46 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (100 lines)

Rec'd with a technical glitch.  --gw

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:52:26 -0500
From: Scott Barker <[log in to unmask]>
To: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: RateMyProfessor.com

At the University of Washington Information School as it is elsewhere, 
teaching is an extremely important factor to consider when evaluating 
faculty for tenure and promotion (as is their research and service).

Like most universities, student evaluations take place at the end of each 
course through an institutionally approved set of forms and processes. 
The evaluations are looked at by the chair of each program, our assistant 
dean for academics, and of our dean as part of the annual merit review 
process.  For guest faculty those evaluations may be looked at more 
regularly, especially if the person is new to teaching for us.  For 
faculty up for tenure and promotion, students and alumni are also asked to 
give additional feedback on teaching beyond the standard course 
evaluations.

We are aware that students use sites like "RateMyProcessor.com" but we 
don't look at them as part of our standard processes.  Some of our faculty 
look themselves however.  Some like what they see and some don't as you'd 
expect.  I'd also note that some of our very best teaching faculty 
occasionally will have a negative comment posted there, and they sometimes 
agonize too much over one negative statement.  But that's good to me, 
because that shows how much they care.

My PERSONAL opinion is that the vast majority of our faculty do a good 
job, and I don't object to sites like "RateMyProcessor".  We have nothing 
to worry about.  I am chair of our undergraduate program and I actually 
find very few students that like a faculty member because the "class was 
easy" or the professor tells good jokes.

  In general, when I look at our institutional student evaluations, for the 
most part students are very fair.  The faculty that do the best on student 
evals are typically the best teaching faculty we have if I had to rate 
them myself.  And it isn't because they are "easy".  Instead it is because 
they are passionate, they get students excited about the material, they 
engage students, the class is well organized, their knowledge is 
up-to-date, they bring past professional and research experience into the 
classroom etc.

This is harsh, but I'd suggest that if a faculty member is worried that 
most comments on "RateMyProfessor" are negative, they should look hard at 
themselves and the content of their course.  Like I said, you can never 
please everyone in a class and everyone will get negative comments.  But 
if the faculty member and the class routinely are evaluated poorly, the 
problem is not likely to be with "RateMyProfessor", it is likely to be 
with the class or instructor.

Scott Barker
Information School
University of Washington



-----Original Message-----
From: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gretchen Whitney
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 5:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RateMyProfessor.com

Greetings,
    A concerned jESSE reader brought this site to my attention privately and
asked that I bring it to your attention for discussion.
    I have not found very many SIS faculty on this site, but I have found a
few.

    The reader wonders how your institution handles such student evaluations
on such a web site, and how these evaluations factor into tenure decisions
and other faculty evaluations.  The reader notes the differences between
course choices by students (which these appear to be having writ large),
and peer evaluations, but also notes that there is a connection between
the two:  if students don't sign up for your courses, that is going to
have a bearing on your evaluation by peers.
    The reader also wonders how you as an individual and as an institution
balance negative reviews ("He asked us to do too much work!!") with
positive reviews ("She's really sexy", "He tells great jokes", "Attendance
isn't mandatory because he posts his lectures online", "Easy!!, "Homework
was not collected" "I only came on test days".

    I and the reader would appreciate your comments on this site.

    And I and the reader would appreciate your comments on such student
evaluations of professorial performance.

    --gw

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Gretchen Whitney, PhD, Retired
School of Information Sciences
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996 USA           [log in to unmask]
http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/
jESSE:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/jesse.html
SIGMETRICS:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTK.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager