[External Email]

Dear Friends and Good People  -     

As you probably have heard by now, Representative Andy Holy and Senator Paul Bailey have proposed HB2721/SB2896, a Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/111/Bill/HB2721.pdf.
Representative Andy Holt <[log in to unmask]>, Senator Paul Bailey <[log in to unmask]>   

Since reading about this bill, I’ve been trying to take The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy's most salient piece of advice: DON'T PANIC.  But that is difficult.

This bill presents as a benign parent-friendly concern, but, in point of fact, it undermines the role of locally appointed or elected library boards, attempts to censor library resources and programming, insults local library staff for not doing their jobs, and threatens fines and jail time for staff and volunteers in public libraries.
At the ALA/Public Library Association national conference in Nashville last week, hundreds of library visitors sent post cards to the state Department of Tourism objecting to the bill.  The Tennessee Library Association has stepped up to advocate for local control by local boards and to support local library staffs, and object to the bill (statement attached).
Additional supporting statements have been made by ALA, the National Coalition Against Censorship, and PEN America.

My experience has been that bills harmful to libraries are best stopped, if possible, in committee (as has happened to the Missouri bill from which the Tennessee bill is copied) before they reach the full legislature stage. 

HB2721/SB2896 has been assigned to the Senate Government Operations Committee and the House Cities & Counties Subcommittee, both of which are meeting this Wednesday, March 4 in Nashville to consider the future of the bill http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=HB2721.    

Having sent personal emails to each of the members on the two committees asking them to stop the bill as unnecessary and redundant, am writing to ask each librarian, should you choose, to contact the committee member from your town to explain why this disruptive bill is not needed. Any and all emails from board and Friends members would also be most helpful.  

Tennessee Senate Government Operations Committee members meeting
Wednesday,  March 4,  8:30 AM
Sen. Kerry Roberts, Chair;  Sen. Mike Bell;  Sen. Janice Bowling; Sen. Rusty Crowe;  Sen. Ed Jackson;  Sen. Sara Kyle;  Sen. Mark Pody;  Sen. Bill Powers;  Sen. Paul Rose

Sen. Kerry Roberts <[log in to unmask]>, Sen.Mike Bell <[log in to unmask]>, Sen. Janice Bowling <[log in to unmask]>, Sen. Rusty Crowe <[log in to unmask]>, Sen. Ed Jackson <[log in to unmask]>,  Sen. Sara Kyle <[log in to unmask]>, Sen. Mark Pody <[log in to unmask]>, Sen. Bill Powers <[log in to unmask]>, Sen. Paul Rose <[log in to unmask]>

Tennessee House Cities & Counties Subcommittee members meeting  
Wednesday, March 4,  3:30 PM
Rep. Jerome Moon, Chair;  Rep. Kent Calfee;  Rep. John Crawford;  Rep. Rusty Grills;  Rep. London Lamar;  Rep. Ron Travis  

"Rep. Jerome Moon" <[log in to unmask]>, "Rep. Kent Calfee" <[log in to unmask]>, "Rep. John Crawford" <[log in to unmask]>, "Rep. Rusty Grills" <[log in to unmask]>, "Rep. London Lamar" <[log in to unmask]>, "Rep. Ron Travis" <[log in to unmask]>  



Here are some points from my letters to the legislators: 

All of the concerns expressed in the bill are currently being handled appropriately by folks in their local communities with no need for any further complicating legislation.  
Also no state law is needed for parents to exercise their concern for their children:  if the library is offering a program they don’t like, don’t attend, and if there are books they don’t like, don’t check them out.  

This bill is an example of trying to fix something that isn’t broke - a solution in search of a problem.

If enacted, this bill 
 
~  usurps local city or county control of its libraries by limiting their responsibilities and authority; 

~  insults the local library’s trustees and staff members (who work so conscientiously and diligently to be of service to their community) for not now doing their jobs responsibly;

~  dictates to local folks that the state knows better how to run their local governments and raise their children than they do; 

~  promotes censorship and discrimination (since libraries will only be permitted to purchase what a committee approves, rather than to meet the needs and interests of the whole community as library staff now does when they select materials); 

~  establishes another level of governmental bureaucracy which will deny the rights of all parents to guide their own children’s use of the library and its resources and services;

~  is anti-parent - allowing those 5 adults (not even required to be parents) to dictate to other parents what their children should/can read in the library:  parents are still the best overseers of their children’s reading;

 >  creates 5-adult-panels with no checks or balances who are not responsible to the local library board of trustees (or any other local authority) for supervision (since local library boards of trustees {or anybody else} have no oversight authority along with no process for questioning a panel’s decision);

~  imprison and fine library staff with no due process or appeal if they don’t do what the committee orders [a Class A misdemeanor subject to a fine or term of imprisonment or both]; and 

~  is anti-Christian (all Bibles will have to be removed from libraries because its sexual content does not meet the “age-inappropriate sexual material” standard set by the bill). 


Thank you for taking time to consider my thoughts.  Please let me know if I can clarify or answer any questions.

And thank you for caring about and providing the library services you do in your local community.
With all best wishes for continuing success  -  Don