Print

Print


The MA degree was possible prior to around 1950, but not a vast number of
folks took it. The move from BLS to MLS started in 1949 or 1950 and was
originated at the Denver University school- hence, referred to as "The
Denver Plan." I am not sure how long it took all the schools to convert to
the MLS, and as late as the 1970s there were unaccredited BLS degrees.

charley

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Gretchen Whitney <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Greetings, and Happy Holidays.
>
>   I am looking for references to the history of library education.  I have
> a colleague who is interested in when the Master's degree was required for
> a librarian, rather than the Bachelor's degree.  I could not answer his
> question.  I do not know when, nor how, this transition happened. While I
> can remember reading this literature in the 1970s, I can't recall it nor
> justify the distinction now.
>
>   Background: I ran into an interesting conversation a few days ago that
> was debating the need for a master's degree in library education (and I am
> being very specific in not saying LIS education) and the need for a
> master's degree as opposed to a bachelors degree for working in, and even
> running, a library.
>
>   I am asking the iSchools to stay OUT of this discussion for now.  This
> concerns library schools.  This concerns schools, both graduate and
> undergraduate, who are trying to educate librarians.
>
>   The conversation is at
>
> http://21stcenturylibrary.com/**2011/12/19/why-not-a-**
> bachelors-in-library-science/<http://21stcenturylibrary.com/2011/12/19/why-not-a-bachelors-in-library-science/>
>
>   I could not answer their questions about why a master's degree was
> required.  I could recall vague ideas about why a librarian needed to have
> a subject specialty because understanding library science underlaid all of
> the other disciplines.  And the collaboratory in a library of these subject
> specialties with the understanding of library sciences made the building
> work.
>
>   I can't refer this colleague to a history of why librarians need a
> master's degree rather than an undergraduate degree.  Neither the ALISE nor
> ASIST website is a help. I have no idea where to send him/her
>
>   Can someone refer me to a decent explanation of why the Master's degree
> is needed to be a "librarian" (and I use the quotes specifically),
> historically or in present terms, and why a Bachelor's degree would not
> suffice?
>
>   Have a great holiday.
>   --gw
>
> PS This is a library education problem. I ask the iSchools to stay out of
> it for a while. IT issues will come in later.
>
>   --ggww
>
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>**<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>**
> <><><><><><><>
> Gretchen Whitney, PhD, Retired
> School of Information Sciences
> University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996 USA           [log in to unmask]
> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/
> jESSE:http://web.utk.edu/~**gwhitney/jesse.html<http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/jesse.html>
> SIGMETRICS:http://web.utk.edu/**~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html<http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html>
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>**<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>**
> <><><><><><><>
>
>


-- 
Charley
aka Desert Sailor