I think it's more significant that most of them are in the SEC with strong football programs, as the article indicates. I doubt it means much of anything at all. We have no idea what their criteria were or how valid they are. They are clearly focused on undergraduates, not graduate programs. If anything is significant, it's the effect of local culture on the image of a university. Suzanne M. Stauffer, Ph.D. Assistant Professor School of Library and Information Science Louisiana State University 275 Coates Hall Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (225)578-1461 Fax: (225)578-4581 [log in to unmask] Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? --T.S. Eliot, "Choruses from The Rock" ________________________________ From: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum on behalf of Gretchen Whitney Sent: Thu 2/16/2012 7:38 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: slacker schools Greetings, I find that there is usually a bit of truth in the most whacko assertion. Here is another example. The trick is to find the truth. I was surprised to learn earlier this week that the Univ of Tenn had been ranked nationally as a "slacker school" - (and I quote) "Inside College quoted CollegeHumor, whose rankings aren't probably as highly regarded as U.S. News and World Report's annual list, describing its rankings as the "power rankings" for schools "having the maximum amount of fun while putting forth the least amount of effort."" See http://tinyurl.com/7psmb2t or the longer URL http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/University_of_Tennessee_ranks_in_Top_T en_Slacker_Schools_Website_139217624.html Upon examination of the original reporting site, there clearly were no criteria for these rankings. However examination of the original site turned up that the following universities (with schools of LIS) were also included in the top ten slacker schools as listed in the institutional members of ALISE:: Alabama (Tuscaloosa) Oklahoma (Norman) Louisiana (Baton Rouge) and Penn State (which as I recall used to have an LIS program of some description). I just find it downright weird that, despite the lack of criteria for identifying "slacker schools," universities with LIS programs account for nearly half of the top ten universities identified as "slacker schools.". When there are fifty or so LIS programs across the country, and at least there are hundreds of universities to be considered. I'm not saying that LIS programs drag down universities (it well could be that LIS programs grew up in less-demanding universities), but I note the interesting appearance of these universities with these LIS programs on this list at such a heavy proportion).. I also note that there are no iSchool universities on the list. Again, this is just an observation. I would certainly not assert that an iSchool could alone raise the perception of a university within its community. But it is interesting that they do not show up here. Comments and observations are welcomed, as always. --gw <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Gretchen Whitney, PhD, Retired School of Information Sciences University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996 USA [log in to unmask] http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/ jESSE:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/jesse.html SIGMETRICS:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>