[log in to unmask]" type="cite">> GOOD
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">>> > > "Freely available" is not the same thing as "free."> >> > I did not say that it was.>
> I see. I assumed when you countered the horrendouus $3,000 price tag with your previous offer "to make the chapters freely available on E-LIS," that you were negating the need for cost recovery. So is it the publisher's profit margin you think out of line?>> > > Money still has to change hands at some point. And I see there are> > a> > > lot of organizations putting membership and other dollars into> > > E-LIS.> >> > I am not aware of that. As far as I understand, CILEA maintains> > the> > server. The editors work as volunteers.>
> Then CILEA is paying for the server space!!!! My point is, someone/thing is. Nice that CILEA can afford it.>
> And while E-LIS may be "freely available" now--discounting, of course, the fact that someone/thing is paying for the internet access by which each of us gets to the site in the first place--will it be able to do so ad infinitum? Let's hope so.>
> (Guess all of the other associations listed are just providing the equivalent of a Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval. Sorry if I misunderstood.)>
> It's easy to forget that big bad corporate publishers absorb a lot of costs we take for granted when singing the praises of "free availability.">
> I guess what annoyed me about the original message was the public slap at Marcia and Mary for wasting their time, and the efforts of their contributors--for example, and I quote, "most of us just don't need these articles"--when they were simply wanting to generate more sales.>
> SueE>
> Sue Easun> ca.linkedin.com/in/sueeasun
> Michelynn McKnight, PhD, AHIP
> Associate Professor
> 269 Coates Hall
> 225-578-7411
> Health Science Librarians: Doing better what they’ve always done well.