In my experience, doctoral studies should be grounded in some theoretical or conceptual framework. Indeed, I would expect this of most master’s thesis too. And, limiting students to literature published in the last five years seems ludicrous for most studies. I haven’t encountered either situation, but if Ken’s experiences are indicative of some trend, that would be a cause for serious concern.

Heidi Julien

Two incidents in the past month lead me to raise a question on this list about doctoral studies. I want to be very careful to frame the question so that it is clear that I am seeking to understand expectations not to criticize them.
At a recent doctoral student presentation the candidate was asked about the theoretical framework for the study. The response was that the institution did not require a theoretical framework (for some of us this is a distinguishing feature between master’s and doctoral work). Is this the case at your institution? Is this a change?
Today a doctoral student from another institution asked me about recent research in a specific area. The institution “requires that I use research no further back than the year 2006.” (I will set aside whether there is any relationship between the topic of study and the date prescription.) Again, is this the case at your institution? Is this a change?
I have not encountered these before and wonder if there are changes underway or I am less aware of expectations elsewhere or whether these are unique.
Thank you.

Ken Haycock
voice: 778-689-5938