 |
 |
Very encouraging -- thanks for posting this, Karen. Wouldn't you think, though, that OCLC could come up with a more descriptive name in the title bar than "1 [OCLC]"? Elsa Kramer IU-SLIS Indianapolis > >Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:52:31 -0400 >From: Karen Weaver <[log in to unmask]> >Subject: Catalog is Out of the Box : OCLC Next Space >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016365ee8a8620805048caf473f" > >I know that the early morning session I attended at ALA Annual in >June, on The Year of Cataloging Research, was filled to capacity >with people sitting on the floor and standing for a space to listen >in, at the back of the large meeting room. >For those who continue to say there is no interest in LIS, I think >they are hugely mistaken and need to take their heads out of the >sand and start offering more courses in cataloging, classification, >metadata and more-- sharing for those interested --Karen W > >NEXT SPACE : the OCLC Newsletter >No.15 >ISSN: 1559-0011 >April 2010 > > >"The catalog is out of the box" > >By Andy Havens and Tom Storey > > ><http://www.oclc.org/us/en/nextspace/015/1.htm>http://www.oclc.org/us/en/nextspace/015/1.htm