Print

Print


Interesting question, indeed.

PACS-L may be all but dead, but, still, much of its 
territory is now being covered by far-from-dead 
lists like Liblicense-L, NGC4LIB, Web4lib. What 
are the dynamics of this kind of thing ?

Lists that are otherwise general-interest but could 
( from an anglophone/American perspective ) 
still be called "specialized" not because of type of 
library / information service, but based on other 
criteria such as language-area or national boundaries, 
are also not immune to hard-to-explain ups and 
downs. I follow, for example, one for German-
language library/information professionals, one for 
Dutch-language professionals, one specifically for 
the UK, in addition to blogs and other services for 
such areas. They vary considerably in e.g. vivacity 
and interactivity. I also for years devotedly followed 
the big general French-language discussion-list in 
our field ( with >17,000 participants ), which was 
active and lively and varied, before it then ceased 
operation in July of last year. A real pity, I found -- 
I miss it quite a bit, and am still in search of good 
services to fill the gap. ( Though I've inquired here 
about this before -- any good suggestions are still 
more than welcome. I would also appreciate any tips 
for Italian- and Spanish-language possibilities. These 
are not easy to locate via anglophone services. )


- Laval Hunsucker
   Breukelen, Nederland





________________________________
From: Sue Myburgh <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 2:27:22 AM
Subject: Re: Library-oriented lists...

 
Gretchen
A very interesting and useful question, to which I don't
have the answers.  
But I can say that in my neck of the woods, the state of
library education is such that, with very few exceptions, many students
graduate as professional librarians without even being aware of forms of
special librarianship - such as music or art or even law; historical or
systematic bibliography, conservation of older materials and incunabula,
history of the book or of libraries, theoretical, political and philosophical
principles of librarianship and information dissemination, the mechanic,
processes and effects of reading, or anything else that is not currently
trendy: technologies reign supreme, as do perhaps some issues around
intellectual property and copyright; children's librarianship is more or less
existent purely because of the dual qualifications necessary in this country to
become a teacher librarian. And they get only snippets of the rest, rather
superficially and with the emphasis strongly on the ‘how’ to do
things, and not ‘why’ they are done at all, thus reducing everybody
to a technician, rather than developing a professional outlook.  
It would not surprise me, therefore, if specialised
communities were not found to exist online.  Even PACS is all but dead.
All the best
S
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Gretchen Whitney
Sent: Friday, 23 April 2010 9:20 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Library-oriented lists...
 
Greetings all,
   In the early days of the Internet/Web (mid 1990s),
there were a variety 
of efforts put forward to organize Internet information
resources 
specifically for librarians. Remnants of these include
 
Wei Wu, Library Oriented Lists and Electronic Serials
http://www.txla.org/pubs/tlj74_1/article5.html
 
Charles Bailey, Library Oriented Lists and E-Serials
http://lawlibrary.ucdavis.edu/LAWLIB/Jan94/0182.html
Note the extensive specialised groups
 
Diane Kovacs, Directory of Scholarly and Professional
E-Conferences
http://www.kovacs.com/directoryhistory.html
 
   These services have died.
 
Troutman, Leslie, An Internet Primer for Music Librarians
http://www.jstor.org/pss/899170
A nice piece that may or may not being kept up to date.
 
What has replaced them?
 
Endeth the preface.
 
What library-oriented electronic communication 
services (permanent/persistent like listserv and other e
mail discussion 
lists) or transient (MySpace, Facebook etc) services are
you referring 
your students to for communication and community?
 
Endeth the question.
 
Beginneth the aftermath.
 
Where does the student go to communicate with like minded
individuals who 
are interested in art or music librarianship, children's
literature, 
repairing books, building web sites, or whatever might be
their field of 
interest.
 
Have the professional associations taken up these
communication needs?
 
Who is pulling this all together for the discipline as a
whole, as the 
early responders did?
 
   --gw
 
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>  
Gretchen Whitney, PhD
Retired
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996 USA          
[log in to unmask]
http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/
jESSE:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/jesse.html
SIGMETRICS:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>  
 
 
All
the best 
Sue
 
Dr Susan Myburgh
School of Communication
University of South Australia
St Bernard's Road
Magill SA 5076
ADELAIDE
 
P: 618 8302 4421
F: 618 8302 4745
E: [log in to unmask]
 
I
refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
 
CRICOSProvider Number 00121B 
 
The opinions expressed in
this email are mine alone.  Only authorised signatories are competent to
enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus
advised that the content of this email may not be legally binding on the
University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which
are not necessarily the views and opinions of the University of South
Australia. 
 
This email message is
intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information that may be
confidential and/or copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please
notify the sender by reply mail and immediately delete this email.  Use,
disclosure or reproduction of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient(s)
is strictly prohibited.  No representation is made this this email or
any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the
responsibility of the recipient.
Please consider the environment
before printing this email