LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for JESSE Archives


JESSE Archives

JESSE Archives


JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JESSE Home

JESSE Home

JESSE  September 2013

JESSE September 2013

Subject:

Re: Users, Technology and Knowledge (fwd)

From:

Gretchen Whitney <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:07:19 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (240 lines)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 21:41:11 -0400
From: Karen Weaver <[log in to unmask]>
To: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Users, Technology and Knowledge (fwd)

>> KW: Why is "documentation" in your "technology section" ?
>
> GW: Given my background with information technolgy, I associate documentation
> with instructions on how to use information technology. If you have a
> better place for it, I'd be happy to hear about your suggestions.
>
>> KW: Bibliography was always associated with "documentation" roots btw
>> much more than "technology"   jumped that bandwagon
>
>GW :  I don't understand your comment here.  I associate "bibliography" with a
> disciple or culture, and "documentation" with an information technology.
> Please explain your ideas.

a good start is here for definitions
Bibliography -- please see:

http://www.bibsocamer.org/bibdef.htm


You seem to associate "documentation" with your background in
information technology, in terms of what I would call technical
writing ie documentation as for a manual how to use something / or
programs.

Mine is quite different.  bibliography, citations , a record of the
information that exists  ie documenting that record -the long record
of it.  this can be in print or online e-resources aka via information
technology and basic print or manuscripts , any formats old or new

your view of documentation i would call 'instructions'  not the record of it.
it's a big problem  - terminologies / backgrounds / and yes biases too
when its more a lack of basic communication/understanding of where the
other person/group is coming from

--cheers KW


On 9/8/13, Gretchen Whitney <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:08:59 -0400
>> From: Karen Weaver <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>
> Good questions.
>
>> "People"  not the equivalent of "Users"
>
> These are the two terms used in the examples that I found.  I would define
> "people" as the total population in the community that you serve.  I would
> define "users" as the people who actually use your services through
> whatever technology.  Remember that there are likely to be a whole lot of
> "people" who don't for whatever reason. Remember that there was also a
> push to connect this triumverate with a local acronym to make it cute
> /h/h/h/h memorable, so that if you were a "University" you were more
> likely to use "users" than "people."
>
>> "Information" not the equivalent of "Knowledge"
>
> The differences between data, information, knowledge, and wisdom is a
> classic question.  They are indeed, very different (IMHO).
>
> We begin with poetry (and Frank Zappa).  I refer you to:
>
> http://poeticsofthought.wordpress.com/tag/t-s-eliot/
>
> which presents the important lines from The Rock.
>
> Then, examine
>
> http://tinyurl.com/pzxdo35
>
> which appears to be some kind of course document, undated, from the U
> Illinois about 2011.  It primarily repeats Ackoff's assertions from 1989.
> (ref. included, that seems to be the classic work).  I'd personally push
> Wisdom more toward the spiritual end of things, but at least the author
> acknowledges that the question exists.
>
> A counterpunch is at
>
> http://www.academia.edu/343239/The_data-information-knowledge-wisdom_hierarchy_and_its_antithesis
>
> which I was able to get to by ignoring demands to sign up for various
> accounts with services.
>
>> Names of an organization do not define "information science" either-
>> why would it?
>
> An organization might in its mission statement or elsewhere define
> "information science", if that phrase is part of its name.  It might use
> the definition to distinguish itself from others also using the phrase as
> part of their name.  Mission statements and other
> associations/organization documents are a logical place to look for
> definitions.
>
>> Why is "documentation" in your "technology section" ?
>
> Given my background with information technolgy, I associate documentation
> with instructions on how to use information technology. If you have a
> better place for it, I'd be happy to hear about your suggestions.
>
>> Bibliography was always associated with "documentation" roots btw
>> much more than "technology"   jumped that bandwagon
>
> I don't understand your comment here.  I associate "bibliography" with a
> disciple or culture, and "documentation" with an information technology.
> Please explain your ideas.
>
> --gw
>
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
> Gretchen Whitney, PhD, Retired
> School of Information Sciences
> University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996 USA           [log in to unmask]
> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/
> jESSE:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/jesse.html
> SIGMETRICS:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>
>>
>> Just some morning thoughts/ponders,
>>  cheers KW
>>
>> On 9/7/13, Gretchen Whitney <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>    I am just reporting observations, and not being critical or
>>> judgemental.
>>>
>>> But I wonder if these phrases form a decent definition of information
>>> science, so elusive after 60 years.
>>>
>>>    I first ran into this triumvirate twenty years ago (get the UTK
>>> thing?)
>>> and at that time it was my first exposure to the intersection of these
>>> ideas under Jose-Marie G.  It was exciting. No one that I had run into
>>> before had ever pulled this Venn diagram together.
>>>    Twenty years later, I'm seeing the same thing presented at Penn State
>>> (http://bulletins.psu.edu/undergrad/courses/A/IST/110) as an
>>> undergraduate
>>> course as a Brand New Concept.
>>>    The triumvirate is also presented as "information, people, and
>>> technology" at the current iSchools website at
>>>
>>> http://ischools.org/
>>>
>>>    I looked at ALISE.org, and it doesn't have a mission statement, and
>>> doesn't include these words (or any others, for that matter).
>>>
>>>    I looked at the ASIST.org web site, and they are still celebrating
>>> the
>>> name change to "and Technology" which happened what, a decade ago? "This
>>> year's conference theme offers an opportunity to reflect on all the
>>> changes that impact on human information interaction and their
>>> implications for information science and technology." Sort of the right
>>> words.
>>>
>>> In other words, there is still not a good definition of "information
>>> science" out there.
>>>
>>>
>>>    I googled "information technology people" and came up with a journal
>>> at
>>> http://www.itandpeople.org/
>>>    which might be worth paying attention to, in its 26th year of
>>> publication.
>>>
>>>    I googled "users technology knowledge" which turned up a bunch of
>>> articles containing one or two terms but not three.
>>>
>>>    I looked at the Wikipedia article for the definition of "information
>>> science" and it was the usual mishmash of unconnected topics. The ideas
>>> here are not bad, and not irrelevant.  I wonder what they would look
>>> like
>>> if they were re-organized under the people - users/information -
>>> knowledge
>>> /information technology framework.
>>>
>>>    Is there a decent definition of information science in this mess?  I
>>> think that there is.  In multiple layers.
>>>
>>>    First layer.  Venn diagram and explain the intersection of users -
>>> people/information - knowledge/information technology.
>>>
>>>    Second layer.  Explain these sectors.  Yes, in full this means in the
>>> information - knowledge section how publishing works, where books come
>>> from, how books are published via the web, history of books, meaning of
>>> bibliography, the whole nine yards.  How cultures are preserved via the
>>> written word.  In full in the information technology section this means
>>> going back to hieroglyphics and the creation of and preservation of the
>>> written word, but also telegraphs and their relationship to text msging,
>>> the written vs spoken word (the telephone), representation of language
>>> and
>>> letters (ASCII eg), verbal vs graphic representations of information,
>>> computing as priesthood and personal computers, networked information.
>>> I
>>> know very little about users and how they process/acquire information.
>>>
>>>    Third layer:  How these three sectors interact.
>>>
>>>
>>>    This foundation for a definition of "information science" in the
>>> intersection of "people - users/information - knowledge/ information
>>> technology"  both avoids, and embraces folks who try to distinguish
>>> between informatics, computer science, natural or engineered information
>>> systems, philosophical systems regarding epistemology.  The history of
>>> science goes in the Knowledge section.  Documentation goes in the
>>> Technology section.  Everyone has a place.
>>>
>>>    The base phrase is "information science."  It is defined as the
>>> intersection between "people, information, and technology".
>>>
>>>    We're done for the night.  Happy Saturday, everyone.
>>>
>>>    --gw
>>>
>>>
>>> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>>> Gretchen Whitney, PhD, Retired
>>> School of Information Sciences
>>> University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996 USA
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/
>>> jESSE:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/jesse.html
>>> SIGMETRICS:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
>>> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>>>
>> Karen Weaver MLS
>> Digital Projects Assistant, Systems
>> Duquesne University, Gumberg Library
>> 600 Forbes Ave
>> Pittsburgh PA 15282
>> Email: [log in to unmask] / [log in to unmask]
>>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTK.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager