LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for JESSE Archives


JESSE Archives

JESSE Archives


JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JESSE Home

JESSE Home

JESSE  July 2013

JESSE July 2013

Subject:

Re: Adjuncts and higher education

From:

Gretchen Whitney <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:27:53 -0400

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (172 lines)

Greetings,
   First, the facts of the case.  One, two reports indicated that the 
number of students being taught by adjuncts and part time faculty appeared 
at about the same time. These (AAUP and ALise) reported that more 
students than ever (about the 1960s) were being taught by non-tenured 
faculty.  I note that my own analysis of LIS education faculty at 
http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/alisegraphics/chart11.html while a decade 
old, noted the rise of part-time faculty in ALISE.
   This is the first fact of the case.  I think that we can agree on the 
data from the AAUP, ALISE, and my own analysis of the ALISE directory that 
as a national trend, and as a disciplinary trend, more and more students 
are being taught by part-time faculty. This is a quantitative trend that 
is clear from this data.
    My second point is partial fact, and partial assumption.  At my 
university, student evaluations are based not on challenges to learning 
but liking the teacher.  YMMV. This not an uncommon assessment of the 
Faculty Senate regarding teaching evaluations. Admittedly, it is a 
personal experience.
    My third point is not to devalue the work and contribution of adjuncts 
and part time folks. It is simply to assert that that experiences and 
knowledge that they offer students is different from academic folks. 
Folks imbued with corporate and institutional work experience offer that - 
the ability to offer to students what it is like to work with real world 
challenges in offering technical design and support.  How to cope with a 
corporate environment which wants to make money.  How to design things and 
services that people want, or to design things that make them want them.
    Academic folks, on the other hand, ideally live in an ivory tower 
(ideally) which enables them to explore ideas wherever they take them, to 
live above the practicalities of getting things done, to explore history, 
to undertand big trends, to get answers to big questions, to explain 
things to the rest of the population.
    These two positions are very different, however you describe them.  On 
the one hand is the world of practical work, and getting those books 
across the counter or getting that software delivered.  On the other hand 
is figuring out DNA and matching individual DNA to cancer cures or getting 
pictures from space and figuring out how the universe started and why 
lions are the only cats in the big cat family who have prides.
    While there are folks who mush in between the two, the point is to 
acknowledge that there are two end points, and two places from which you 
can start.  One is worker, the second is academic.
    This is the third point:  PTAs and adjuncts, as one group, have a 
different beginning point and perspective, from academics.  It is not that 
they have a different cultural value, they are just different.

    My fourth and last point regards whether university administrators 
suppport your decision to be liked or respected. At this institution, 
administrators chose the method of faculty evaluation, apparently without 
faculty senate input.  My comments may be personally skewed. YMMV.  But 
other reports would be interesting.

   --gw


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Gretchen Whitney, PhD, Retired
School of Information Sciences
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996 USA           [log in to unmask]
http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/
jESSE:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/jesse.html
SIGMETRICS:http://web.utk.edu/~gwhitney/sigmetrics.html
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, kslisadjunct wrote:

> I would like to reproduce here a post I read on JESSE and to which I 
>answered as the convener of our SIG.
>
> The reason I am sharing this is that my first reaction was outrage at 
>feeling insulted by having yet another time the quality of our work as 
>educators being questioned by the implication that we care more about 
>being liked by students than about what students learn (so we can keep 
>our jobs). However, I chose to look at Dr. Whitney's comment differently 
>and wondered if what she tried to say is that university administrators 
>are responsible for educators wanting to be liked rather than respected. 
>I'd like to know what others think. Dr. Whitney mentioned at the end of 
>her post that she was not interested in getting answers. But I am.
>
> Catherine
>
> Below is G. Whitney's post followed by my answer(its posting is pending approval by G. Whitney who moderates the list).
> _____________________________________________________________________
> De : Gretchen Whitney <[log in to unmask]>
>  : [log in to unmask]
>
> Greetings,
>  In addition to the note appended, please note the AAUP report on the use
> of adjuncts in general in higher education at
>
> http://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/2013%20Salary%20Survey%20Tables%20and%20Figures/Figure%201.pdf
>
> Or at tiny url
>
> http://tinyurl.com/blqxeof
>
> I mix into these articles the assertion that undergraduates and graduate
> students are paying more and more for their education. Granted. Given.
>
> I assert that the other half of the equation ", but students are getting
> less and less for what they pay" is being given little attention.
>
> In other words, students are going to college and paying more and more,
> but they are being asked to do (and learn) less and less.
>
> They are being asked to do (and learn) less and less because they are
> being taught by graduate students and adjuncts who are judged in their
> student evaluations by how well they are liked. Not challenged to broaden
> their thinking, challenged to consider new ideas, or challenged to do work
> that they did not know that they could do, but discover that they can.
>
> Of course, if you want to be liked you are more likely to assign 2
> two-page essays and a multiple choice final exam for your course, rather
> than a big term paper and other assignments and a comprehensive written
> exam.
>
> Just some more things to think about, and pulling diverse comments
> together talking about the same thing.
>
> Here is a really ugly question.  I don't want or expect answers.  But it
> is something to think about.  As a faculty member, is your primary goal to
> be liked or respected?
>
> And does your administration support you in that goal?
>
> The above two sets of evidence suggest the first.
>
>  --gw
> ____________________________________________________________________
> My answer
>
> I wish here to respond to the comments accompanying the note circulated 
>on JESSE LISTSERV. I am writing not only as an adjunct but as the 
>convener of the ALISE Part-time and Adjunct Faculty SIG.
>
∆> First, I would like to remind our colleagues that PTA faculty are not 
the only educators "who are judged in their student evaluations by how well they are liked." All faculty are submitted to the same multiple choice student evaluations and all educators are automatically entered by students in a popularity contest. Therefore it would seem that our tenure track colleagues share our lot and would be as vulnerable as we are
> in "want[ing] to be liked ] . . . [and being] more likely to assign 2 two-page essays and a multiple choice final exam for . . . [their] course, rather than a big term paper and other assignments and a comprehensive written
> exam."
> A prejudicial implication seems to be that adjunct and part-time faculty are not doing their job as educators properly because of the precariousness of their employment. Still, let us not debate this point; I would like instead all our colleagues to focus their energies on trying to answer the question regarding the administration's role in supporting the goals of achieving popularity status rather than educational goals deserves consideration as well as the question "what are the goals and motivations of higher education administrators for our LIS programs?" In particular, I would to invite Dr. Whitney to participate as a panelist in the Part-time and adjunct faculty SIG session Casualties and Collateral Damages: A Critical Look at Educational Entrepreneurship at the ALISE 2014 conference.
>
> Catherine Closet-Crane, Phd, MLS
> Convener ALISE PTA Faculty SIG
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ALISEadjunct/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
>    Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
>    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ALISEadjunct/join
>    (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
>    [log in to unmask]
>    [log in to unmask]
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    [log in to unmask]
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTK.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager