LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for JESSE Archives


JESSE Archives

JESSE Archives


JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JESSE Home

JESSE Home

JESSE  April 2011

JESSE April 2011

Subject:

Re: Doctoral Expectations and Frameworks

From:

"Bonnici, Laurie" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:35:51 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (106 lines)

As Elfreda Chatman well explained, the purpose of theory is an attempt to explain a phenomenon.  Thus I conclude that a theoretical framework is an attempt at an attempt to explain a phenomenon.  A model is a cursory attempt at an attempt to attempt to explain a phenomenon.  It would seem that we would require a theory, a theoretical framework, or minimally a proposed model assuming that a dissertation is studying a phenomenon (or perhaps more than one).  If not, I would not consider it a dissertation.

Well, there is the result of having your brain scrambled in a blender.  But as Elfreda Chatman said, too many people want to make theory a complicated issue.  I tend to follow her advise...KISS.

Now, as for the date restriction on referenced literature?  Hmmmmm, has anyone conducted a content analysis of LIS literature examining/comparing the literature review content to the analysis and findings content of peer-reviewed journals?

------------------------------------------------------------------
Laurie J. Bonnici, Ph.D.
Project ALFA     http://www.projectalfa.slis.ua.edu
Assistant Professor
University of Alabama
College of Communication and Information Sciences
School of Library and Information Studies
Tuscaloosa, AL
Phone:  205-348-8824
Fax: 205-348-3746

________________________________________
From: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Shawne Miksa [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 6:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Doctoral Expectations and Frameworks

I’ve been pondering this thread for a few days, as well as talking with
various doctoral students who have become increasingly confused and
frustrated with this thread because of the multiple definitions (maybe) of
theory or theoretical framework.

So, define theory.

Define theoretical framework.

Define the steps for theory creation.

Provide a link to the document from your institution that states a
dissertation must include a theoretical framework—as defined and agreed upon
by all your faculty. I don’t think I have ever seen such a thing. As such, I
would never make an assumption about one institution’s supposed requirement,
or lack thereof, based on the one student’s response.

 I had the great and terrifying honor of taking Elfreda Chatman’s “Theory
Development” course at FSU in the Fall of 1998.  She began by stating that
most of what is called ‘theory’ is in fact not a theory.  We learned the
structure of a theory, we built our own theories (my favorite was the one
Laurie Bonnici and I created called “the theory of bubbas and bubbettes”),
we studied “theorists” and their theories---where she again emphasized that
some were not theories but perhaps just incomplete models or hypothesis. We
discussed logic, proving theories, grounding theories, what makes a theory a
universal theory, and how we might use theory in our own work. (My good
friend Laurie described very aptly how a person feels after taking Elfreda’s
class---as if someone opened up your brain, scrabbled it with an egg beater,
and then put the top back on. )

We can discuss theoretical concepts that apply to a study in the literature
review—is this what we commonly call creating a theoretical framework?  Does
any program require all their students to write a separate chapter just for
theory? Can some dissertations essentially be grounded theory--the beginning
of a new theory? ( I do, but some of my colleagues disagree with me on that
one. Makes for interesting debates.)  Can we take a part of a theory—one
concept, for example—and base a study on it? Is that creating a theoretical
framework?

I’m teaching my first doctoral course this semester and I quickly realized I
needed to dust off some of my old understandings of theories, models, etc. I
started re-reading books and collecting new books on theory construction,
grounded theory, methodologies. They don’t seem to have very many common
definitions. One work that I have found helpful is "Theory Construction and
Model-building Skills: a practical guide for social scientists" by James
Jaccard and Jacob Jacoby (2010).  Here is the first paragraph of the Preface:

"Theory construction is at the heart of the scientific process. The
strategies that social scientists use to generate and develop ideas are
important to understand and foster in young academics and investigators as
they prepare for a research-oriented career.  Although books have been
written about theory construction, there are surprisingly few books on the
topic that tackle the problem of teaching students and young professionals
in a practical and concrete way, how to theorize. Students, especially
graduate students, take one or more courses on research methods and data
analysis, but few experience more than a lecture or two, read a chapter or
two, on theory construction. It is no wonder that students are often
intimidated by the prospect of constructing theories." (p. ix)

This describes exactly a part of working with doctoral students that is the
most challenging. I think most students do employ theoretical frameworks
based on their deep immersion in the literature that gives contexts for
their studies---they just may not realize it. Or perhaps they realize the
framework they need doesn’t yet exist. I’ve certainly read many articles—and
have assigned my students to read them—that are full of lofty, deep,
profound, and abstract thoughts and ideas, but that are no where near being
a theory. At least, not as far as I have been taught.

S.Miksa


************************************************************
Shawne D. Miksa, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Acting Associate Director, IISPhD Program
Department of Library and Information Sciences
College of Information
University of North Texas
email: [log in to unmask]
http://courses.unt.edu/smiksa/index.htm
office 940-565-3560 fax 940-565-3101
************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTK.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager