LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for JESSE Archives


JESSE Archives

JESSE Archives


JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JESSE Home

JESSE Home

JESSE  April 2011

JESSE April 2011

Subject:

Re: A special appeal-not meager, just cataloging knowledge required-WorldCat

From:

Karen Weaver <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 3 Apr 2011 20:51:37 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (107 lines)

This discussion actually is an error in information retrieval and
information searching.
and not about any implications about "meager reception" and so on.

As first mentioned, this is a continuation title and a series,
something most catalogers would know about at least in terms of how
such an item would be processed in a library and how it would be also
found in a bibliographic database such as WorldCat.
Such problems in verifying holdings and format are a good example for
LIS educators about the importance of teaching cataloging today.

the Library of Congress is one standard to look at first which is also
located in Worldcat records.
We can see that when this title first started, it had different editors.
When you have subsequent editions of a title that continues, such
materials usually stay classified the same way as the first volume of
the title was and it becomes annotated.
Unless there are significant changes, it stays usually as the
continuation/series record.

So we can look back to this first volume back in 1968 of the first
edition edited by Allen Kent et al.
  please see here: http://lccn.loc.gov/68031232
1st edition different editors & cataloged as a series/continuation
at LC

This is classified as a series at most libraries still. and a quick
look at WorldCat showed me under one record some 332+ holding
locations for this series as standing orders.
see OCLC: 4380549 for the original series record that was updated in
2010 in Worldcat

So while we have many different formats, print, ebook, e-resource , we
also have various ways that these have been and continue to be
cataloged with holdings in WorldCat.
If you did a quick personal name search in WorldCat say for Bates,
Marcia, this also likely will not pull up editors and only authors.

for the 2010 edition in print I saw over 55 or so holdings on one
record -keep in mind there were several other records in e-formats.
Then keep in mind the main original way these were cataloged as
continuations were on series records, not monographs (i.e. one time
publications).

These are very important examples for educators to also understand
differences in formats, organization of information, and how users
--students, faculty, researchers and John Q. Public find and access
information today.

It's MISINFORMATION coming out of the various pipelines.

I hope this has been helpful, I'm delighted to see the 3rd edition available
and hope to see many more editions in the years ahead.

Again, big thanks to Dr Bates & Dr Maack for your dedicated work on this project
that is and remains--a standard also for the accreditation of our
library & information science education programs by continuing to
maintain these high quality standard reference resources in our field.

Best regards,

Karen Weaver, MLS, Electronic Resources Statistician, Duquesne
University, Gumberg Library, Pittsburgh PA email: [log in to unmask]
/Gmail: [log in to unmask]

On 4/3/11, Laval Hunsucker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> OK, folks. Quite apart from this nice little bilateral discussion
> that has now arisen, . . .
>
> The simple fact remains that the product in question has met
> with an exceptionally meager reception. And that this means
> that all of that fantastic content on which so many colleagues
> have expended such effort not merely is "not freely available"
> -- it is hardly accessible at all to probably the vast majority
> of those fellow professionals in the world who could -- and
> should be able to -- directly benefit from its use. Or to those
> who ( like me ) would in any event very much like at least to
> be in a position to consult the resource from time to time. Or
> to most students or, say, interdisciplinary researchers. Not to
> mention its (non)accessibility to an interested, or potentially
> interested, general public.
>
> Shouldn't this by itself give pause, and occasion for reflection,
> to all concerned -- not least of all to those who have actually
> participated in bringing the project to fruition ?
>
> That's the real issue, no ? Was the chosen approach indeed
> the best one ? A right one ? Why has such a large portion
> of the projected, and potential, market not been convinced ?
> And what can be done to right the matter -- beyond pathetic
> appeals to reconsider and finally shell out that three grand,
> aimed at the hardcore LIS education sector ? Are there
> perhaps broader implications here for questions of scholarly
> communication, professional development, and progress in
> our field ? For the health, or even survival, of our field ?
>
> Silly questions ? Anyway, enough questions.
>
> And answers ?
>
>
>
> - Laval Hunsucker
> Breukelen, Nederland
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTK.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager