LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for LIBNT-L Archives


LIBNT-L Archives

LIBNT-L Archives


LIBNT-L@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIBNT-L Home

LIBNT-L Home

LIBNT-L  May 2010

LIBNT-L May 2010

Subject:

Re: Deep Freeze vs. SteadyState

From:

Chris Cooper <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Library NT <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 12 May 2010 15:13:12 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (102 lines)

Thank you everyone who replied to this post. It has REALLY helped. We've decided to purchase DF and see how it works in our (Windows) environment. 

I am not immediately concerned about SteadyState's non-compatibility with Windows 7 because we are slow to adopt new OS's--too many other hardware/software compatibility issues on both our staff and public networks. Also, to answer Andrew Mutch, my network admin is not willing to implement a domain controller on our public network right now because of the cost (and he's getting ready to retire). Maybe on the next grant.

My main concern--since I am successfully doing automatic, scheduled antivirus & Windows updates with SteadyState, and I'm doing wake & shutdown with BIOS settings or scheduled tasks--was whether it will help with other routine tasks. I'm talking about "little" (time-consuming) things like updating other software (Adobe, Flash, QuickTime, PaintShop etc), changing my proxy restrictions, add/remove printers, plus other desktop customizations and SteadyState Windows and User Restrictions. As far as locking (freezing) the integrity of the hard disk, I've been pretty happy with SS's Windows Disk Protection so it's a toss-up except for the central management issue. I hope this makes sense.

We will see how it goes...

Chris Cooper | Library PC Technician 
Everett Public Library 
425.257.8039 | [log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Library NT [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Judy Wilkin
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LIBNT-L] Deep Freeze vs. SteadyState

We now have Groovix on Ubantu Linux installed on pcs we already owned.   
5 branches, 115 public pcs.   basically solved every issue with public 
pcs, including central control and nightly updates.

http://groovix.com/

On 5/6/2010 3:37 PM, Rick Widmer wrote:
> I'll have more to say on this later, but for now I've got to add a
> couple of comments...
>
> On 5/6/2010 2:05 PM, Chad Neeper (list) wrote:
>> It takes just one trip to the computer to repair something a patron
>> did to pay for the DF license for that computer. It's all "profit"
>> after that.
>
> You need the enterprise version of Deep Freeze!  No trip to the 
> computer, you can shutdown and restart from any machine with the 
> enterprise console installed.  There is no limit on the number of 
> consoles you can install at your site, once you have rights to use it. 
> With only 10 computers in my lab, I would not want to live without the 
> enterprise version!
>
> I was very happy with Deep Freeze before I switched to SteadyState.
>
>
>> Also worthwhile knowing: Microsoft apparently has no plans to
>> continue development of Steady State. There is no SS intended for
>> Windows 7.
>
> Yes, this has been announced, but I still have a little bit of hope 
> that M$ may see reason.  If you have any interest in SteadyState at 
> all, please stop by TechNet and add your vote for SteadyState on 
> Windows 7. I am currently dragging my feet on updating our public 
> computers to Win 7 in hope that they will relent before I have to move.
>
> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/windowssteadystate/thread/8ddff48e-aa90-4bf3-9b5a-4b11b02906bb 
>
>
> There are quite a few people unhappy with this decision.
>
> http://www.windowssecrets.com/2010/04/08/01-Microsoft-decision-puts-public-libraries-at-risk 
>
>
>
> At least there are still a couple of years left before XP becomes 
> unsupported, and you can still get XP for public computers from Tech 
> Soup.  (It was still listed Tuesday when I looked...)
>
>
> Rick
>


-- 
Judy Wilkin, Systems Administrator
Porter County Public Library System
103 Jefferson St, Valparaiso IN 46383-4820
(219) 462-0524 ext. 120
[log in to unmask]

 -----------------------------------------

Chris,

Any particular reason not to be on a domain? It seems that it would be a ridiculously easy investment to justify the cost of a box running Windows server to allow you to use Active Directory and Group Policy to do all of the things you listed below. I manage around 90 public and staff computers at two locations on two networks and I can't imagine doing that without the tools available through a Windows domain controller. 
 
Andrew Mutch
Libra
________________________________________
From: Library NT [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Cooper
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:25 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Deep Freeze vs. SteadyState

We are preparing to purchase DF Enterprise on a grant for the main reason stated in this discussion: “centrally managing” our PCs. I have been using the Gates PAC tool / Shared Computer Toolkit / SteadyState since 2002, when we received our first Gates grant. We are currently running Windows XP, CA eTrust anti-virus* and PC Reservation by Envisionware (plus LPT.One print management). I have all computers configured to run Windows and eTrust updates daily through SteadyState’s Disk Protection tool, and it is working very well.
The only reason I am tempted to even consider DF is because of the central management feature (92 public PCs and growing, and only one desktop support person). However, now I am having reservations about it because it won’t help me to control the following:
Locking down – Add printers, control panel, task manager, change password, network places, viewing and changing C: drive, run command, management console, autoplay CDs, locking the workstation, keyboard shortcuts, access to certain programs, etc, etc. I will still have to use SteadyState and touch each and every computer to make changes. I still cannot control these computers remotely, like I could if I were on a domain (which I am not, on this network) with SMS or Remote Desktop. I’ve tried TightVNC but it’s a bit hoaky and unreliable.
I also cannot centrally customize desktop icons or IE toolbars, menu items and favorites with DF; I still can’t centrally update certain applications (like Adobe) without a script (I really don’t do scripting), and I can’t add/remove printers from the console. Am I right? So aside from doing what SteadyState Disk Protection does from one location, can someone tell me…why do I want DF? 
Chris Cooper | Library PC Technician 
Everett Public Library 
425.257.8039 | [log in to unmask]
*BTW, just between the two of us – we went without virus protection for years because of disk protection. But we are now using it simply to protect our patrons, not necessarily our hard drives. We don’t want them bringing in or taking malware elsewhere.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2016
December 2014
June 2014
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
October 2011
June 2011
May 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
December 2009
November 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTK.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager