LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for JESSE Archives


JESSE Archives

JESSE Archives


JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JESSE Home

JESSE Home

JESSE  May 2010

JESSE May 2010

Subject:

Re: Where do libraries fit in the "information-seeking food chain"? (fwd)

From:

"Louise S.Robbins" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sat, 1 May 2010 10:05:01 -0500

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (284 lines) , lsrobbin.vcf (13 lines)

Anyone who has worked in an academic reference position can attest to the value students attach to assistance in achieving their assignment goals. Once upon a time I had a student make a trek back to the library to show me his grade, with the "I couldn't have done it without you" accolade. I can also recall helping an attorney find information from the Code of Federal Regulations that assisted his case against a truck driver who backed a semi across a dark highway in the middle of the night, leading to the death in a crash of the attorney's client. A family in Janesville, WI, gave millions of dollars to the public library there saying they could not have started their family business without the assistance they got there. I suspect others could provide many similar examples, but it would be wonderful if there were a way to gather the data systematically, other than the ROI studies accessible from the ALA web site.

On 04/30/10, Laval Hunsucker  <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Thanks very much to Louise ( and to Holly Willett 
> as well ). How unfortunate that this particular JHU 
> example, apparently, actually came down to a case 
> of life and death. 
> 
> Can anyone refer to such ( potential ) evidence from 
> outside the medical realm ?
> 
> The archival example is also most interesting, but 
> archival resources would seem to me to constitute a 
> category apart.
> 
> 
> -Laval Hunsucker
>  Breukelen, Nederland
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Louise S.Robbins <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thu, April 29, 2010 3:59:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Where do libraries fit in the "information-seeking food chain"? (fwd)
> 
> Of course, two examples don't provide robust evidence, but a few years ago, a Johns Hopkins researcher used a therapy on a patient that proved fatal. The research existed that would have warned him not to use this therapy in this instance, but working without expert searching assistance, he did not find it. It made the news at the time. 
> 
> More personally, I was doing research at the Library of Congress and told the archivist what I was looking for and the purpose of my research. She immediately pulled out and handed me a remarkable letter from William Carlos Williams's wife blaming Assistant Librarian of Congress Verner Clapp for a breakdown Williams suffered in about 1952-3. Williams's biographer did not see that letter. 
> 
> Could one do a dissertation today without interlibrary loan? Especially if one is not at one of the major major universities.
> And how about the collection building and organizing that is also part of what librarians and archivists do? What about the social activists who are tooled in the library? And the children who become readers?
> 
> On 04/28/10, Laval Hunsucker  <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> > This is a very good and useful post of Bob's, in my opinion, 
> > and it largely rings true.  ( The part about Powerpoint reminds 
> > me of a nice little film, "How NOT To Use Powerpoint", 
> > of which some of you may be aware :  
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BP2HlNmRJ4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BP2HlNmRJ4) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BP2HlNmRJ4) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BP2HlNmRJ4)) .
> > As they say, "In der Beschränkung zeigt sich der Meister". )
> > 
> > With respect to Bob's good question :  
> > 
> > > Why should we expect students and perhaps even faculty
> > > to follow a different principle for our area of concern? 
> > 
> > Here's something I've been sort of wanting to ask, and I'm 
> > not being facetious :  
> > 
> > Does any of you know a librarian who has ever actually 
> > come out and said the following, or something comparable, 
> > to a researcher, say an historian or
> >  a geologist
> >  or a social 
> > psychologist or a classicist or a microbiologist or a 
> > musicologist ? :  
> > 
> > "Prof. A, I have carefully read through your recent article, 
> > X, in The International Journal of Y, and, I want to tell you, 
> > it can clearly be shown that this article would have made a 
> > more significant contribution to the field [ or avoided such-
> > and-such a shortcoming, etc. ] if you had in the process of 
> > preparing it only consulted with a librarian, or had only 
> > previously followed a course of instruction by library staff 
> > on effective literature searching in the databases which the 
> > library has licensed and made available to the university 
> > community."  Or suchlike.
> > 
> > Follow-up question :  does any of you know of an actual 
> > case in which, though no one may have pointed this out to 
> > the researcher involved, such an assertion by the librarian 
> > could more or less objectively have been demonstrated
> >  
> > to
> >  be correct ?  
> > 
> > Last question :  Is anyone here in a position to produce 
> > valid and reliable evidence that, in any academic field of 
> > his/her choice, the state of knowledge at the moment ( in 
> > history or geology or social psychology or classics or 
> > microbiology or musicology or anthropology or whatever 
> > you like ) is less advanced, or the achievements to date 
> > less impressive, than they might have been, namely 
> > because its specialists have made insufficient use of 
> > librarians, librarians' methods, or recommended library 
> > resources ? 
> > 
> > OK -- forget maybe about a cause-and-effect relationship, 
> > if you like. What about even statistically valid evidence of 
> > a positive correlation ?
> > 
> > One could put the same questions, mutatis mutandis, 
> > regarding the scholars'/scientists' accomplishments as 
> > educators rather than for the moment as researchers, if 
> > one so desired. 
> > 
> > Why am I posing
> >  these questions ?  Are they silly ? Am I 
> > being much too overly simplistic ?
> > 
> > *Can* librarians and other "information professionals" 
> > render, empirically, their oft-heard claims and critiques 
> > credible ?  Convincing ?  Irrefutable ?  Have I missed 
> > something, and have they, in practice, accomplished 
> > such a task already ?
> > 
> > I'd really like to be steered toward some clear cases in 
> > point, should they exist.
> > 
> > You can also turn it around :  Any obvious cases of googling 
> > scholars' ultimately screwing it up ?  Of a discipline that's not 
> > as far as it could be, or is deteriorating, because of too much 
> > googling by its researchers ? 
> > 
> > Isn't this kind of like where the rubber really hits the road ?
> > 
> > So to repeat Bob's question quoted above :  "Why should we 
> > expect students and perhaps even faculty to follow a different 
> > principle for our area of concern?" Why
> >  indeed ?
> > 
> > If the real validity and value of our way of looking at things 
> > can be shown, in black and white as it were, with solid 
> > pragmatic evidence, will the outside world then not *have* 
> > to listen, and then to behave accordingly ( unless they 
> > genuinely *aren't* in their right minds ) ?
> > 
> > If these *can't* be shown, should we then finally give up on 
> > all the lamentations and protestations and preaching to the 
> > choir that we've been doing for as long as I can remember, 
> > and start expending our energy in a more meaningful 
> > ( productive, facilitating ) way ? 
> > 
> > It was perhaps a fun game, but who needs it anymore ?
> > 
> > Am I talking nonsense ?  [ Don't answer that ! :-) ]
> > 
> > 
> > - Laval Hunsucker
> >    Breukelen, Nederland
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From:
> >  Bob Holley <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 1:04:38 AM
> > Subject: Re: Where do libraries fit in the "information-seeking food chain"? (fwd)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I would like to present the concept of “it’s good enough” to
> > meet my needs. My PowerPoint presentations are minimalistic. With a few hours
> > of free instruction, I would be able to present results that would be dazzling
> > compared with what I do now. But I’m always busy and have other competing
> > priorities. The PowerPoint’s that I do produce are “good enough” and don’t get
> > me booted off the podium.
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > As long as faculty accept and give reasonable grades to research
> > produced from a naïve use of Google and other “easy” resources, time stressed
> > and efficient students won’t feel the need to develop more complex information
> > seeking skills because what they are doing produces “good enough” results.
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > I’m sure that most of us have areas in our life where we could
> > do much better with a bit of extra effort, but we don’t bother because what we
> > are doing meets our needs. Why should we expect students and perhaps even
> > faculty to follow a different principle for our area of concern? I’m sure that
> > we’ve all been in situations where all we wanted to do was minimally accomplish
> > a task and judged all the additional attempts to impart knowledge as
> > frustrating for wasting our time on a topic where we didn’t want to know more.
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Bob
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >   
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Robert P. Holley
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Professor, School of Library & Information Science
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Wayne State University
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Detroit, MI 48202
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 1-888-497-8754, ext 705 (phone)
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 313-577-7563 (fax)
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> (email)
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >      
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> Louise S. Robbins
> Professor 
> School of Library and Information Studies
> University of Wisconsin-Madison
> 600 North Park Street room 4253
> Madison WI 53706
> [log in to unmask]
> Phone: 608-263-2955
> Fax:  608-263-4849
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
-- 
Louise S. Robbins
Professor 
School of Library and Information Studies
University of Wisconsin-Madison
600 North Park Street room 4253
Madison WI 53706
[log in to unmask]
Phone: 608-263-2955
Fax:  608-263-4849




Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTK.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager